2004-04-30                     House Journal                      Page 3711
HB 468                                                                                            
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 29,                               
2004, calendar (page 3625), was read the third time:                                                
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 468(JUD)                                                                 
     "An Act relating to the amount of the bond required to stay                                    
     execution of a judgment in civil litigation involving a signatory, a                           
     successor of a signatory, or an affiliate of a signatory to the                                
     tobacco product Master Settlement Agreement during an appeal;                                  
     amending Rules 204 and 205, Alaska Rules of Appellate                                          
     Procedure; and providing for an effective date."                                               
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 468(JUD) pass the House?"  The                                     
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
CSHB 468(JUD)                                                                                       
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  21   NAYS:  14   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  3                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Fate,                                      
Foster, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Joule, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire,                                  
Morgan, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wolf                                                
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Berkowitz, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula,                                        
Kohring, Kookesh, Meyer, Moses, Ogg, Samuels, Stoltze, Wilson                                       
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Cissna, Holm                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Gatto, Guttenberg, Rokeberg                                                                
                                                                                                    
Weyhrauch changed from "Nay" to "Yea".                                                              
Hawker changed from "Nay" to "Yea".                                                                 
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 468(JUD) passed the House.                                                             
                                                                                                    

2004-04-30                     House Journal                      Page 3712
Representative Coghill moved the court rule changes.                                                
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the court rule changes be adopted?"  The                                
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
CSHB 468(JUD)                                                                                       
Third Reading                                                                                       
Court Rules                                                                                         
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  22   NAYS:  10   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  6                                                  
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Fate,                               
Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Kapsner, Kerttula,                                    
Kookesh, Kott, McGuire, Morgan, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stepovich,                                        
Williams                                                                                            
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Dahlstrom, Gara, Hawker, Kohring, Lynn, Meyer, Ogg,                                          
Samuels, Stoltze, Weyhrauch                                                                         
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Cissna, Holm                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Heinze, Joule, Masek, Moses, Wilson, Wolf                                                  
                                                                                                    
And so, lacking the necessary 27 votes, the court rule changes were                                 
not adopted and the new title follows:                                                              
                                                                                                    
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 468(JUD)(ct rule fld)                                                    
     "An Act relating to the amount of the bond required to stay                                    
     execution of a judgment in civil litigation involving a signatory, a                           
     successor of a signatory, or an affiliate of a signatory to the                                
     tobacco product Master Settlement Agreement during an appeal;                                  
     and providing for an effective date."                                                          
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause.                                             
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?"  The                             
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
CSHB 468(JUD)(ct rule fld)                                                                          
Third Reading                                                                                       
Effective Date                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  31   NAYS:  6   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  1                                                   
                                                                                                    

2004-04-30                     House Journal                      Page 3713
Yeas:  Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate,                               
Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Harris, Hawker, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula,                                 
Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg,                                      
Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson,                                   
Wolf                                                                                                
                                                                                                    
Nays:  Berkowitz, Gara, Guttenberg, Lynn, Meyer, Moses                                              
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Cissna, Holm                                                                              
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Heinze                                                                                     
                                                                                                    
And so, the effective date clause was adopted.                                                      
                                                                                                    
Representative Anderson gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on                               
CSHB 468(JUD)(ct rule fld).